Mumbai Magistrate Not Justified in Issuing Summons Against WB CM Mamata Banerjee, Says Special Court

0

Last Updated: January 17, 2023, 20:57 IST

The detailed order was made available on Tuesday. (Representative image)

The detailed order was made obtainable on Tuesday. (Representative picture)

The Justice of the Peace courtroom had mentioned sanction was not required as Banerjee was not discharging her official obligation when the alleged incident occurred

The Mumbai metropolitan Justice of the Peace was “not justified” in issuing summons to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in a matter pertaining to alleged disrespect to the national anthem, a special court observed while setting aside the summons.

Special judge for cases against MPs and MLAs, R N Rokade, on January 12 set aside the summons against CM Banerjee and referred the matter back to the magistrate for a fresh review of the facts in the light of the complaint.

The detailed order was made available on Tuesday.

A Mumbai court in February 2022 issued a summons to Banerjee and directed her to appear before it on March 2 after the city unit BJP functionary, Vivekanand Gupta, approached the magistrate’s court with a complaint claiming the West Bengal chief minister had shown disrespect to the national anthem during her visit to the Maharashtra capital.

In the order setting aside the summons against CM Banerjee, the special court said under Section 200 of the CrPC (Criminal Procedure Code) on the presentation of the complaint by an individual, other than a public servant, the magistrate is required to examine the complainant on the solemn affirmation and witnesses present if any.

However, in a case in which the accused is residing at a place beyond the area in which the magistrate exercises his jurisdiction, it is mandatory to hold an inquiry or the investigation he thinks fit to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding.

The special court said the provisions of section 202 of the CrPC were amended vide the Amendment Act, 2005, making it mandatory to postpone the issue of the process where the accused resides in an area beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the magistrate concerned.

“In the case at hand, the magistrate relied upon the statement of the complainant in the form of an affidavit which is contrary to the provision under Section 200 of the CrPC. Apparently, it seems that the magistrate deviated from the mandatory provisions as laid down under Sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC,” the particular courtroom mentioned.

“Having regard to the whole gamut of the circumstances together with nature of the allegations, the fabric positioned in help of it and improper verification of the complainant, I’m of the thought-about view that the Justice of the Peace just isn’t justified in issuing course of in opposition to the accused,” the special judge added.

The judge also said a proper course would be to remit the matter back to the metropolitan magistrate with direction to comply and adhere to the procedure mandated under sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC.

“…And then to afresh apply his mind to the facts of the case so as to determine whether a prima facie case to the offence as alleged against the accused in the said complaint, warranting issuance of the process, is made out, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the complainant,” the decide famous.

Vivekanand Gupta had approached the metropolitan Justice of the Peace’s courtroom at Mazgaon in December 2021 with a criticism in opposition to CM Banerjee, who can be head of the Trinamool Congress (TMC). He demanded an FIR be registered in opposition to her underneath the Prevention of Insults to the National Honour Act.

The Justice of the Peace courtroom had mentioned sanction was not required as Banerjee was not discharging her official obligation when the alleged incident occurred.

“Though the accused is the chief minister of West Bengal, she was not discharging her official duties (through the occasion in Mumbai). Thereby, this act of the accused, although she is the chief minister of West Bengal, doesn’t come underneath her official obligation. Therefore, the sanction just isn’t required and there’s no bar to proceed in opposition to the accused,” the magistrate’s court had said.

The West Bengal chief minister subsequently filed a review petition before the special court challenging the order of the magistrate’s court.

Read all the Latest India News here

(This story has not been edited by News18 workers and is revealed from a syndicated information company feed)

Source hyperlink

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here