Home World News BBC’s hitjob on PM Modi relies on Jack Straw’s phrases, but he’s known to have been a liar himself

BBC’s hitjob on PM Modi relies on Jack Straw’s phrases, but he’s known to have been a liar himself

BBC’s hitjob on PM Modi relies on Jack Straw’s phrases, but he’s known to have been a liar himself


Pack of lies: BBC's hitjob on PM Modi relies on Jack Straw's words, but he's known to have been a liar himself

Former British international secretary Jack Straw. AFP.

London: Former British international secretary Jack Straw, who featured in BBC’s documentary  on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that has been dubbed as “propaganda piece designed to push a particular discredited narrative”, has lied on a number of events about his position in influencing the file about presence WMDs in Iraq which led to the latter’s invasion.

So far because the BBC hitjob is anxious, Straw had featured within the documentary supporting a mentioned British excessive fee’s investigation of the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Straw has lately claimed that the UK authorities had again then instituted an inquiry and a staff visited Gujarat to examine the riots.

Straw had allegedly fabricated file of WMD [weapons of mass destruction] and was additionally accused by his countrymen for peddling lies. Not simply this, the international secretary in Tony Blair authorities, attacked journalists for exposing lies.

Jack Straw was implicated within the Chilcot Report that investigated the WMD file and the British navy motion in Iraq.

Jack Straw a ‘liar’

In 2015, Straw was branded a “liar” within the House of Commons as he justified Britain’s involvement within the Iraq War in 2003.

Straw, who was international secretary from 2001 to 2006, was talking in a debate on the ground of House of Commons on the delays to publication of the Iraq War report by the panel chaired by Sir John Chilcot. He drew a slew of abuse from Respect MP George Galloway when he was discussing talks with the UN Security Council.

For the unversed, forward of the Iraqi invasion, Straw was going through a “moral as well as political dilemma”. He additionally supported navy motion which he mentioned was “the most difficult decision” he ever took, including that it was an “error”.

Back in 2003, Straw admitted that file on Iraq’s WMD precipitated an “embarrassment” for the UK authorities. He, nonetheless, in 2016, didn’t discuss a lot concerning the claims he made within the file to justify the invasion which he as soon as asserted “haunted” him ever since.

The Chilcot report introduced to fore a wholly completely different image that highlighted Straw’s key position in making Iraq a goal.

Notably, the UK government-led by Tony Blair had commissioned an intelligence paper on the WMD menace from “rough states”. Before the file was offered, the menace from Iraq was seen as much less severe than different key nations of concern that included Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Straw had additionally determined that a paper on Iraq ought to be issued with out them having point out of different international locations of concern. In lower than a week from then, Straw modified his model and this time he suggested that the proof wouldn’t persuade public opinion that there was an imminent menace from Iraq.

Publication of the file was delayed and course of was initiated for the one that may persuade public opinion that “military action was necessary”.

Hutton inquiry

Notably, it was not the primary time that Straw’s culpability got here to fore. In 2004, through the Hutton inquiry, an e mail written by Straw’s then non-public secretary surfaced which elucidated the position of the then international secretary in “hardening up” the file with a “killer paragraph”.

Back then, a memorandum copied to Alastair Campbell and John Scarlett, the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, which produced the file, learn: “The Foreign Secretary has now had a chance to go through the draft dossier. He has endorsed the comments I made earlier on…”

The factors which have been endorsed by Straw said, “The first bullet of para 6 the importance of weapons of mass destruction should be strengthened to explain the centrality of WMD to Saddam Hussein’s role – the projection of power etc…. Crucially the section should explain the role of the WMD in the political mythology which has sustained the regime.”

According to stories, the Blair-led authorities had a coverage of attacking journalists who questioned its Iraqi coverage, particularly with reference to weapons of mass destruction.

Read all of the Latest NewsTrending NewsCricket NewsBollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News right here. Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram.


Source hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here