Last Updated: January 20, 2023, 19:29 IST
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a batch of pleas difficult the Bihar authorities’s determination to conduct a caste survey within the state.
A bench of justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath mentioned there isn’t a advantage within the petitions and dismissed them with liberty to the petitioners to method the excessive court docket involved.
“So this is publicity interest litigation. How can we issue directions on how much reservation should be granted to such and such caste? How will they (state) determine how much reservation is to be granted to whom? Sorry, we can’t issue such directions and can’t entertain these petitions,” the bench instructed the counsel for the petitioners.
The prime court docket, which was listening to three petitions on the problem together with one filed by an NGO, mentioned the petitioners can method the Patna High Court for an applicable treatment.
“All the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in law,” the bench ordered.
On January 11, the highest court docket had mentioned that it might take up the matter on January 20, after one of many petitioners talked about an pressing itemizing of the matter.
One of the PILs on the problem was filed within the apex court docket by advocate Barun Kumar Sinha in search of quashing of the notification issued by deputy secretary, authorities of Bihar, for conducting a caste survey within the state and to restrain the authorities involved from conducting the train.
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought quashing of the notification dated June 6, 2022 issued by the Bihar authorities.
The plea contended that the topic of the survey falls in List 1 of the seventh Schedule of the Constitution and solely the Centre has the facility to maintain the train.
The PIL alleged that the notification violated Article 14 of the Constitution which offers for equality earlier than legislation and equal safety beneath the legislation, including that the notification was “illegal, arbitrary, irrational and unconstitutional”.
“If the proclaimed purpose of the caste-based survey is to accommodate the people of State suffering caste persecution, the distinction on the basis of caste and country of origin is irrational and unjustified. None of these distinctions correspond with the ostensible purpose of the law,” the petition mentioned.
Read all of the Latest Politics News right here
(This story has not been edited by News18 workers and is revealed from a syndicated information company feed)