Home Nation News Law Minister Rijiju’s Latest Remark in Collegium Flashpoint

Law Minister Rijiju’s Latest Remark in Collegium Flashpoint

0
Law Minister Rijiju’s Latest Remark in Collegium Flashpoint

Last Updated: January 23, 2023, 23:27 IST

Union Minister of Law and Justice Kiren Rijuju speaks at a function to celebrate the Republic Day 2023 with the members of Delhi Bar Association, at Tis Hazari Courts Complex, in New Delhi, Monday, Jan. 23, 2023. (PTI Photo)

Union Minister of Law and Justice Kiren Rijuju speaks at a perform to have a good time the Republic Day 2023 with the members of Delhi Bar Association, at Tis Hazari Courts Complex, in New Delhi, Monday, Jan. 23, 2023. (PTI Photo)

Law minister Kiren Rijiju’s feedback are the most recent in the flashpoint between the manager and judiciary amid an ongoing debate over the Supreme Court’s collegium system of appointing judges

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday stated that judges don’t should face elections and so they haven’t any public scrutiny, however folks nonetheless “watch” and “assess” them from the best way they ship justice. The legislation minister’s feedback are the most recent in the flashpoint between the manager and judiciary amid an ongoing debate over the Supreme Court’s collegium system of appointing judges.

At a Republic Day perform organised on the Tis Hazari courts complicated in the nationwide capital, Rijiju stated, “There is no public scrutiny of judges…as people don’t elect you, they cannot replace you. But people are watching you — your judgements, the way you deliver verdicts — people are watching and making assessments and forming opinions,” he said, adding that nothing is hidden in the era of social media.

ALSO READ: How is Kiren Rijiju’s Latest Proposal to CJI Different from the NJAC Stance? EXPLAINED

In a veiled attack on the collegium system, Rijiju said, “Don’t think that no questions would be raised on the existing system. And sometimes, there are changes that are brought to the existing system. That’s why more than 100 amendments are brought to the existing system.”

The legislation minister, nonetheless, additionally stated that there’s no “Mahabharat” going on between the government and the judiciary as is being projected by some sections. He asked if there is no debate or discussion in a democracy, “what kind of democracy is it”.

Rijiju said the government has some views and if there is a difference between the two opinions, “some people present it like a Mahabharat is going on between the government and the judiciary. It is not like that…we have no problem among us,” he said.

Explaining further, the law minister said that in the Bharatiya Janata Party, it is said that we can have “matbhed” (divergence of opinion), but not “manbhed” (discord). “We can have different opinions. Difference in opinion does not mean we are mounting an attack on each other,” he said.

Addressing the gathering, Rijiju also said that the Chief Justice of India had urged him to do something about the attacks that judges face on social media platforms. He wanted to know how to control the insulting language against judges.

“I have thought about what should be done. There is a provision of contempt. But when people comment on a mass scale, then what can be done? While we are facing public scrutiny and criticism on a daily basis, judges too are facing the same now,” he said.

The collegium flashpoint

Rijiju had described the collegium system – which came into force in 1992 – as something “alien” to the Indian Constitution. He had earlier advised News18 that the collegium system of judicial appointment was defective and have to be modified.

The legislation minister not too long ago wrote to Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud suggesting the inclusion of representatives of the Union and state governments in the Supreme Court and excessive court docket collegiums, respectively, to infuse transparency and public accountability in the collection of judges.

ALSO READ: ‘…Lack Constitution’s Understanding’: Rijiju’s View on Judges’ Appointment | Collegium System Rift Explained

This had stirred up a political row with Delhi Chief Minister and AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal calling the transfer harmful. Rijiju, nonetheless, stated that his letter to the CJI — searching for illustration of the Centre in the Supreme Court Collegium — was “just a follow-up action” in sync with a earlier Supreme Court judgment.

On Sunday, Rijiju cited the views of a retired excessive court docket decide, who stated the Supreme Court “hijacked” the Constitution by deciding to nominate judges itself.

Sharing the video of an interview of Justice R S Sodhi (retd), a former decide of the Delhi Court, on Twitter, Rijiju wrote: “elected representatives represent the interests of the People & make laws. Our Judiciary is independent and our Constitution is Supreme.”

(With PTI inputs)

Read all of the Latest India News right here

Source hyperlink

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here