Home Nation News Citing B’luru Example, SC Warns Chandigarh Over Sanctioning More Flats

Citing B’luru Example, SC Warns Chandigarh Over Sanctioning More Flats

0
Citing B’luru Example, SC Warns Chandigarh Over Sanctioning More Flats

Last Updated: January 12, 2023, 12:45 IST

The hearing was headed by a bench of Justices B R Gavai and B V Nagarathna
(Image: News18)

The listening to was headed by a bench of Justices B R Gavai and B V Nagarathna
(Image: News18)

According to a report revealed in October final 12 months, Bengaluru is the fourth costliest actual property market within the nation

Citing the “situation of Bengaluru”, the Supreme Court on Tuesday barred the “fragmentation or apartmentalisation” of residential models in phase-I of Chandigarh. The prime court docket held that doing so will injure the “lungs” of the city as conceptualized by French architect Le Corbusier who had designed it.

“Warning flagged by the city of Bengaluru needs to be given due attention by the legislature, executive and policy-makers. It is high time that before permitting urban development, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of such development is done,” a Hindustan Times report quoted the SC as saying.

The listening to was headed by a bench of Justices B R Gavai and B V Nagarathna. The Chandigarh administration was slammed for “blindly sanctioning” building plans. The court also alleged that the administration is behind converting one dwelling unit into three apartments. “Such a haphazard growth may adversely affect the heritage status of phase­-I of Chandigarh which is sought to be inscribed as a UNESCO’s heritage city,” the bench stated in its 131-page verdict.

According to a report revealed in October final 12 months, Bengaluru is the fourth costliest actual property market within the nation. The information was present in a report by consultancy agency Knight Frank that established an ‘affordability index’ for the third quarter of 2022.

Apartmentalisation of residential models, mainly refers to creating residences out of single-dwelling models. The Supreme Court prohibited its building citing enviromental causes. Chandigarh was developed in two phases — section­-I having sectors 1 to 30 and section­-II having sectors 31 to 47.

Earlier, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had additionally stated that apartmentalisation just isn’t permissible. Citing the identical, Supreme Court went on to carry that although builders or builders are in impact indulging in building of three residences in a constructing the identical doesn’t quantity to apartmentalisation. “In our view, this might quantity to allowing one thing not directly which isn’t permitted straight,” it said.

Supreme Court also said the Chandigarh administration shall not formulate rules or by­laws without prior consultation of the committee and prior approval of the Centre.

It said the number of floors in phase­-I shall be restricted to three with a uniform maximum height as deemed appropriate by the Heritage Conservation Committee keeping in view the requirement to maintain its heritage status

While appealing to the legislature, the executive and policy makers at the Centre and states to make necessary provision for carrying out environmental impact assessment studies before permitting urban development, the apex court said it is necessary that a proper balance is struck between sustainable development and environmental protection.

(With PTI Inputs)

Read all of the Latest India News right here

Source hyperlink

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here